The very factors that make art valuable, can also be destructive. Art is subjective vs. objective (individual taste and beliefs pervade; ‘because I like it, it is good…’), fad-driven (NFTs that celebrities were crawling over each other to acquire, are now selling at a 90% haircut compared to prices during peak popularity), and unpredictable (a shark in formaldehyde sold for $8million). We are witness these influences in our current climate, with subjective and unpredictable deal-making and business decisions (‘it will be good, because I said so’) at global and national levels.
While few of us are in positions to significantly influence global outcomes in the short term, there are efforts we can all take to mitigate local and longer term impacts of this flawed approach. One of the at risk areas is diversity, equity and inclusion. Hard fought efforts and actions are being undermined and, in some cases, completely destroyed. Within this, gender diversity is a mature field of research that offers compelling science-based insights.
The science tells us:
In the face of influential decision and deal-makers who believe they ‘know what’s best’ and weaponize terms such as ‘woke’ and ‘anti-meritocratic’ to undermine gender and other diversity, equity and inclusion efforts; science-based decision-making becomes our armour. It is science that can support us to ensure we are selecting and promoting people into leadership roles who have the right attributes to influence organisational success and prosperity; to make good deals, for a better future - economically and socially. Take care that subjectivity and fads do not obscure judgement and decision-making in your organisation about who should lead.
Need more information? Contact the Winsborough Team:
winsborough.co.nz | 0800 222 061 | support@winsborough.co.nz